Autistic Studies

View Original

“Special Needs” is an Ableist Term

STOP using the phrase, “special needs”—it perpetuates the false belief that only disabled people have individualized needs and that accepting and supporting a person's individualized needs is "special"--harming both disabled and non-disabled people. There is nothing special about having your own unique needs or the desire to get those needs met.

As a society, we like to pretend that non-disabled people's needs are met under typical practices, but the truth is that an education system focused on standardized testing and compliance, and a 9-to-5 job in a cubicle with low wages and a high cost of living isn't working for anyone. It seems to me that corporations and billionaires are the ones with "special needs" and they come at a high cost to all of us.

"Special needs," is also a whitewashed word. It makes it sound like disabled people's needs are supported and cared for and treated as if they are "special"--that's false.

Disability programs often do little more than strip people of dignity, agency, and legal rights while condemning them to a life of poverty. School IEP programs include "supports" such as "planned ignoring," and disabled adults lack marriage equality because they lose their (impoverished) disability income once they get married--how special.

Disabled is not a bad word, but when you don’t use it, it helps spread the myth that it is, all while perpetuating a false whitewashed idea about the way disabled people are treated. I am not ashamed to be disabled—do not be ashamed for me.